Billy Wilder is among one of definitely the directors in the past. A unique feature of his films is the fact that it isn't a lttle bit outdated even today. He made great comedies, great noir films and serious detective stories. It would be to aforementioned how the'Witness for the Prosecution'of 1957 belongs. I watched that great detective movie Witness for any Prosecution (1957) on #link# online with free streaming in HD.

The plot requires the way it is of Leonardo Vole, who's accused of murdering an elderly lady for profit. A sick lawyer Wilfrid Robarts, played by way of the inimitable Charles Lawton, decides to profit the child, believing in the innocence. However, all his plans collapse when Leonardo's wife Christina (Marlene Dietrich) appears in the courtroom ... https://pastebin.pl/view/937ec698 However, further everything are going to be even more complicated and interesting.


Probably, even the most ingenious viewer won't be able to calculate how this story will finish, who definitely are really guilty ... https://anotepad.com/notes/h3ge5imb The film constantly offers the viewer new and new details from the plot and keeps them in suspense until the end.

Separately, I will note the acting performance of Marlene Dietrich. Many people feel, she was and remains the single most outstanding actresses in the history of Cinema. She starred in'Witnesses for your Prosecution'already in the venerable age, so she used not her beauty, but exclusively the artist's talent. And Marlene coped along with her role perfectly.


Summing up, we could safely declare that'The Witness of the Prosecution'is among the best detectives from the field of Cinema and only a fantastic film from an awesome director.

Films that have obtained the approval of anyone as “classic cinema” in the decades will have their particular special atmosphere and, usually, develop themes who were, are and will be relevant. This is actually the film adaptation of one of the pages on the immortal creativity of Agatha Christie, for almost 5o years it has developed into frequenter of all kinds of ratings and tops, especially in conjunction with the subgenre of legal drama. Although while in the 1950s color cinema was no longer something outlandish, "Witness for the Prosecution" is remembered largely due to traditional black and white palette, or rather one shade.

What made Witness for your Prosecution very popular and expressive. The fact is, a total mixture of factors, including original literary, cast, socially relevant topic. While the sensation of your magic of cinema doesn't arise, and it also does not work to call the film exciting, it really, to some extent, absorbs for a few hours of viewing. The viewers spoiled by modern cinema can easily pass by, due to prejudices, contrived moral obsolescence. The fact is, The Witness for your Prosecution laid down a lot of those elements that people still see in the courtroom dramas and detective stories, that are based on a semblance of the intellectual challenge. During viewing, now and then at my head associations in what I've seen, not surprisingly, in support of the 1957 film.

When it comes to plot itself, from the peak with the was already seen within the genre (I confess, not quite a goal argument), there isn't a all-consuming intrigue that would pour a chilly shower of bright emotions. We will spend a good part in our period in a depressing and gloomy courtroom, the place that the jury will decide the fate on the accused of murdering an elderly widow. Interestingly, the twelve jurors are shown an exclusively secondary role here, along with the viewer's attention is drawn specifically the opposition between Defense and Accusation. For my family, the brightest performer had not been Marlene Dietrich, whose benefit performance is tough not to notice, in addition to her appearance at a decent age for a lady over 50. I'd been simply subdued from the picture of an intolerant and rude, but incredibly professional lawyer done by Charles Lawton.